Thursday, 24 October 2013

Symolism in Robert Frost's Poems

Topic:- Symbolism in Robert Frost’s Poems
Sub:- The American Literature
Name:- Vajani Bhumi N.
M.A-2 Sem-3
Roll No:- 04
Year:- 2013-14
Submitted To:-Department of English,
                          Maharaja Krishnakumarsinhji,
                         Bhavnagar University
Ø     Symbolism in Robert Forst’s poems
Introduction:-
                                      Robert Lee Frost is one of the greatest of American poets. This great poet was born in San Francisco, California on march 26,1874. There lay a piece of paper bearing the four following lines on Jawaharlal Nehru’s office desk after his death. Robert Frost’s poem was-
“The woods are lovely, dark and deep,
   But I have promises o keep,
   And miles to go before I sleep,
   And miles to go before I sleep.”
This poem is an inspirational poem.
                                      During the winter of 1906, he came so near to death, from pneumonia that both he and his doctor were surprised when he recovered. Then he turned to poetry. Frost received more honors’ than any other contemporary literary figure in America. He was elected to the membership of the national Institutes of Arts and Letters in 1916, to membership in the American Academy in 1930. He was awarded Pulitzer Prize for poetry four times. On the occasion of his seventy-fifth birthday, and again on his eighty-fifth, the U.S Senate adopted a formal resolution extending felicitations to him. He was given honorary degrees by more than forty colleges and universities, including Oxford and Cambridge. In 1961, he was called upon to recite his patriotic poem. The gift Outright, when the late president Kennedy took office. He died in January, 1963.

Symbol:-
                                      In the broadest sense a symbol is anything which signifies something else; in this sense all words are symbols. In discussing literature, however, the term “Symbol” is applied only to a word or phrase that signifies an objects or event which in its turn signifies something, or suggests a range of reference, beyond itself. Some symbol are conventional or ‘Public’, thus ‘The Cross’, ‘The Red, White, and Blue’ and ‘The Good Shepherd’ are terms that refer to symbolic objects.
                                      “Symbolism transforms the phenomenon into idea, the idea into an image, and in such a way the idea remains always infinitely active an unapproachable in the image and even if expressed in all language, still would remain in expressible”.
                                      In the period World War I an era of symbolism began in the literature. The literary figures exploit symbols from religious or esoteric traditions work can be symbolic in setting, in agents, in the action and in the object.

Symbolism:-
                                      Symbolism is a 19th century literary and artistic movement that sought to evoke, rather then describe idea or feelings through the use of symbolic images. It’s artistic method of revealing ideas or truths through the use of symbols.(Encarta) Poet of Romantic Period, especially Novelists and Holderlin in Germany and Shelly in England, used private symbols while writing poetries. Shelly wrote about morning and evening star, a boat moving upstream, a serpent and an eagles contemporaries in his recourse to as persistent and symbolisms. His lyric poems and his long prophetic poems or epic poems.
                                         In the Nineteenth-century America, a symbolism was a prominent element in the novels of Nathaniel Hawthorne and Herman Melville, the prose of Emerson and Thoreau, and the poetic theory and practice of Poe. The writers derived this mode in large part from the native puritan tradition of divine topology.
                                      Symbolist movement began with specifically a group of the French writes beginning with Charles Bauldelaire, Paul Nerlaine, Stephane Mallarme and Paul Valery.
Importance of symbols:-
                                      In addition to the meanings, Symbols evoke the eyes of our mind. Symbols are emotionally rich. Symbols make the language rich and expressive. Inexpressible concepts can be expressed through symbols. Symbols can be used to express mystery.
Regions used as Symbols:-
                                      Frost is considered to be a great regional poet. The scenes sights, events and Characters of New England form the base of his poetry. The region North of Boston becomes a microcosm of the world at large, and his Yankee characters became symbolic of human nature in all ages and countries. The emotional arguments of the mother in the poem ‘Home Burial’ is the symbol of stress and strain, isolation and alienation which is a stuff of humanity in the modern age.
Symbol from Nature:-
                                      Such symbols have been used by all parts through the ages, because they came to the mind naturally and spontaneously. Frost’s symbols came from simple source, yet it should be noted at the same time that they are full of complexity. His symbols convey more than concept. A brief analysis of a few of his more prominent lyrics would suffice to bring out the characteristic feature of frost’s symbolist technique.
Symbolism in ‘Mending wall’:-
                                      The fence of ‘Mending wall’ has literal and hidden meaning. It symbolizes religious, political and economic conflicts, national, religious, political and economic conflicts, national, racial, and prejudices which divide man from man and come in the way of mutual understanding and harmonious relationship.
“Good fences make good neighbors”.
                                      At the same time, the poem literally deals with a conflict related with an old man and his young neighbor. The two neighbors represent the problem between traditional sand modernity, Aged and young. The young wants to move away from his tradition and rebuilt his society on the other side the old uphold the value of the traditional and customary. The poem seems simple the richness of its texture is revealed only on a symbolic interpretation. Something in ‘Nature’ is against all the fences and walls.
“Something there is that doesn’t love a wall, That sends the frozen ground swell under it, And spills the upper boulders in the sun;”
                                      The poem deals with two contradictory ideas-fencing the wall and not fencing the wall. The poem leads one to question-whether there should be a boundary or not. Though intentions on both the side are clear, yet the poem’s total meaning is not offered. Frost imply portray the problem and explore the many different and paradoxical issues it involves, the lines…..
“Something there is that doesn’t love a wall”
“Good fences make good neighbours”.
Have logical contradiction. Both lines are opposites of each other. To emphasize view points, he playfully adds…..
“He is all pine and I am apple archard, my apple trees will never get across And eat the cones under his pines, I tell him.”

“Symbolism in Home Burial”:-

                                      ‘Home Burial’ is a poem that deals with an ‘over wrought’ mother’s feelings. The mother in this poem can’t forget that her husband himself dug the grave of their buried the child. She can’t forget that her husband buried the child their little grave yard. She thinks her husband, a callous person. The memory of the child has separated her from her husband. The husband is a simple man and is baffled by the excessiveness of her sorrow…..
“I do think, though, you overdo it a little what was it brought you up to think it the thing to take your mother-loss of a first child”.
He thinks that his love for her should be sufficient to console her.
“Don’t, don’t, don’t, don’t, she cried.”
                                      The poem depicts the grief of a sentimental mother who lost her child and whose husband himself dug the child in the graveyard to bury him. The whole meaning of the poem is symbolized by the open door in the last stanza poem:
Wife: “You-oh, you think the talk is all. I must go somewhere out of this house. How can I make you…”

Husband: “If you-do-she was opening the door wider- ‘where do you mean to go? First, tell me that i’ll follow and bring you back by force. I will…”. 
                                      The emotional arguments of the mother in the poem ‘Home Burial’ is the symbol of sisters and strain, isolation and alienation which is a stuff of humanity in the modern age.
                                      ‘Home Burial’ has been highly praised by a number of critics. Randull Jarrell calls it the “Submit of our poetry”. And “Unique in 20th century poetry”. “The talk is the talk of everyday”- but “there situation is strange”. Mother’s grief is given universal significance. The opening of the door by wife in the end is symbolic. Marriage is a containing relationship and ‘home’ can not be, and must not be given up despite grave emotional crisis.
“Symbolism in  Design”:-

                                      Design is a beautiful sonnet by Frost. Frost’s universe is very different from other poets. His concept is unique. Critic’s praied ‘Design’. It is almost terrifying poem. According to Lawrence Thompson the poem is…..
          “A dark study-in-white”
                                      The ‘heal-all’ is a comman country plant supposed to have healing properties hence its name is ‘heal-all’. It’s color is blue but some varieties bear white flowers. The poet comes across this plant. The spider holds a white moth in its mouth. Thus, the pattern of whiteness is seen by the poet. The white spider, the white flower, and the white moth with dead wings,…..
          “And dead wings carried like a paper kite”.
                                      The poet observes this design or pattern of whiteness and talks about the same. The coming together of these three is intentional or not is not known. This pattern might be brought together by same prime mover, which sets the pattern and controls and guides the movement.
                                      The pattern which the poet observes is white, but in reality it is a bringing together of different ingredients of, “death and blight.”
“What brought the Kindered spider to that high then steered the white moth either in the night? What but design of darkness to appall? If design govern in thing so small.”
                                      The poet believes that there is a power that governs things that occurs, some unknown power weaves such appalling, ‘designs of darkness.” But in the end, the poet admits the possibility that there is no such appalling design or plan, that the coming together, of the white spider, the white flower and moth but man inhabitants in the petty, small and insignificant to have such design.
                                      Frost’s world-view is mores realistic. He glorifies ‘Nature’ as ‘kind mother or calls it’ holy plan. Frost challenges and upsets the romantic view of Nature.                  
Symbolism in ‘The Gift Outright’:-
                                      The Gift outright is a wonderful patriotic poem. This poem is very small lyric. A critic called Randall Jarrell call it…..
          “The best Patriotic poem ever written about our own country.”
Where as another critic call the poem,…..
          “The love of country is not expressed in Screaming or hysterical flag-waving, but in a salvation of faith, in surrender to the land”.
Frost himself regarded ‘The gift outright’ as…..
          ‘A nice piece of blank verse’
 And he calls it-
‘A history of the United states in Sixteen lines.’
                                      This poem is symbol of religion. This poem begins with an account of the coming of the British colonists in America. They become the colonials of America, and called the country their colony. Though they lived in America they considered England as their motherland. They lacked the patriotic feeling for the land they lived in. They believed in possession but not in belongingness…..
          “Possessing what we were still unpossessed by,
Possessed by what we now no more possessed.”
                                      In the beginning the colonizers called the land theirs but they did not love the country whole heartedly. They lived in the land for which they had no affection. Later on, as the time passed they started loving the land. Now, America was their beloved country…..
          “We were witholding from our land of living
 And farthvith found solution in surrender.”
                                      It was their love for their motherland that brought them to move west words and discover their country in all her virgin with simplicity and glory. Changes would not affect their love for her.
                                      The Patriotic feeling for one’s own country is universalized in very simple style.
Symbolism is Fire and Ice:-
                                      The poem “Fire and Ice” provides the best illustration of the use of metaphysical and antithesis by Robert Frost. Opposite concepts ‘Fire’ and ‘Ice’ have been presented in ‘Fire’ and ’ice’. The poet has the two concepts. Fire symbolizes cold of hatred and death.
                                      Fire and Ice are only nine lines’ poem. This short poem his succeeded in opening our eyes for deeper meaning. Desire to fire and haste to ice are human emotions, transformed into impersonal forces’. The poem is very rich in imagery critics commented on the hardness of the poem.
“Some say the would will end in fire, some say in ice.
 From what I’ve tasted of desire
 I hold with those who favour fire.”
                                      The lyric expresses the poet’s dreaded acceptance of the passion, both of love and hatred in their most destructive form. The intense heat of love or desire and the extreme cold of hate are compared and found to be equally destructive.
                                      ‘Fire and Ice’ is terrifying because of the intensity with which the forces of destruction are diagnosed and accepted. The emotion is intensely felt, but its expression is restrained and controlled. The poem is the representation of powerful and intense feelings. The poem is ironic and terrifying.
The destructive features of life are exhibited here calmly…..
I think I known enough of hate to say that for destruction Ice Is also great And would Suffice.”
Symbolism in “Stopping By woods on a anowy Evening:-
                                      ‘Stopping By woods on a snowy Evening’ is one of the moving lyric of Frost. Wiiliam o’ Conner says-“Like Milten’s sonnet “on his Blindness” and Arnold’s Dover Beach, seems to have established itself permanently in anthologies.” The poet pauses one evening along a country road to watch the snowfall in the woods:
“The woods are lovely, dark and deep”
And as he gazes into the soft, silent whiteness, he is tempted to stay on and on,  allowing his mind to lose itself in the enchanted grove.
“But I have promises to keep,
And miles to go before I sleep
And miles to go before I sleep”.
But he gains consciousness quickly and says…..
“But I have promises to keep”
Johan Lynen says…..
          “This is the core of the poem, moving personal experience exquisitely rendered. Yet in reconsidering it, one cannot shake off the feeling that a good deal more is intended.
                                      “The real depth, richness and significance of the lyric is brought only on the bases of symbolism. A critic admires this poem for its ‘natural symbolism’. Sleep, darkness and snow suggest death and the woods suggest perilous enchantment. Commenting on the rich symbolism of the poem, one critic writes, “here atleast the ‘clear and classical’, ‘frost has adopted something technical of symbolism that vague shadow of romanticism.”
                                      Stopping by woods has rich texture and admits some interpretation. If we see its surface meaning, it seems to us as if a simple take that depicts the poet pause the woods. The poet is getting lost in the fascinating snowfall but soon remembers that his journey and many miles to go.
                                      “Frost technique of communication is essentially symbolic. Frost conveys his message through rich symbols. He states his themes with the help of symbols. Pessimism was also symbolically reflected in his poem, for example…..
A light he was to no one but himself where now he sat, concerned with he knew not what,
A quite light, and then not even that.
The log that shifted with a jolt once in the stove, disturbed him and hi shifted,
And eased his heavy breathing, but still step.
                                      These above lines do not simply takes old age but death. Such was his symbolism.”
                                      “Frost’s view of life is austere and tragic, yet his capacity for finding joy is poignantly ever ready. His spirit is torn by dubieties, his best poem offer queries, not affirmations. The salvation he seeks seems hard to come by. It demands great renunciations. His sensibility of his ancestors. In many ways he is the counterpart of T.S.Eliot.”
Conclusion:-
                                      Frost’s poem included various symbols which may not be easy to grasp.
His symbol communicates. Frost’s poems are symbolically mysterious. They are suggestive and indirect. Readers have to take trouble to comprehend. Frost’s symbolic poem fully one needs to do homework. One should have they knowledge of the solid background of Frost poems. Then and then one could understand the hidden meaning of his poems.


Friday, 22 March 2013

Four Goals of Cultural Studies


Four Goals of Cultural Studies

Name                          :           Bhumi Vajani
                                                M.A. – English Part – I

Sem.                            :           2

Roll No.                     :           04

Paper                          :           Cultural  Studies

Topic                          :           Four Goals of Cultural  Studies

Submitted to              :           Dr. Dilip  Barad
                                                Dept. of  English
                                                M.K. Bhavnagar University




Four Goals of Cultural  Studies


          ‘Culture’ is a term which has may connotations cultural is refinement or development of mind tastes, etc. by education, training and experience. It is a form of civilization. It can be called an advance development of the human power. Also culture is an evidence of intellectual development in a particular nation. The meaning and context of culture differs from country to country and person to person.

          A college class on the American novel is reading a famous book of Allice Walker called. The Colour purple (1982). In the classroom the professor identifies African American literacy and cultural sources and then he describers the book’s multilayered narrative structure. Also the professor gave a brief review of its feminist critique of American gender and racial attitudes. Films and novels of different countries show their varied culture even gestures differ from culture.

ORIGIN :
          ‘Culture’, derives from ‘Cultura’ and ‘colere’ meaning ‘to cultivate’. It also meant ‘to honour’ and ‘project’ by the 19th century in Europe it tastes of the upper class (elite).

          ‘culture’ is the mode of producing meaning and ideas. This ‘mode’ is a negotiation over which meanings are valid. Elite culture controls meanings because it controls the terms of the debate.

          Culture studies looks at marker popular culture and everyday life. Popular culture is the culture of masses. A culture study argues that culture is about the meanings a community or society generates. A cultural study believes that the ‘culture’ of a community includes various aspects: economic, spatial, ideological, erotic and political. Culture is not a natural thing it is produced, cultural studies is interested in production and consumption of culture. Emphasis on discourse and totality are at centre to cultural studies. It believes that we cannot ‘read’ cultural artifacts only within the esthetic realm.

          Stuart Hall’s work has been a trendsetter in cultural studies and inaugurated the field in Britain. Hall’s essay of ‘encoding’ and Decoding ‘set the scene’ for cultural studies of the media. The essay argued about meaning within the texts – songs, painting, TV soaps takes helps of codes to organize. ‘Culture’ which makes a society “a cultured society”.

Margaret Mead: “Culture is the learned behavior of society or a subgroup.”
Clifford Geertz : “Culture is simply ensemble of stories we tell ourselves about ourselves.”
The tone of this early version of cultural studies was set by students if the British New left, especially Richard Hoggart and Raymond Williams.
Function :
          What cultural studies does is to interpret sings of culture such as the ones listed above as part of a power struggle to acquire, maintain or contest meanings. The ‘Critique’ component of cultural studies explores the political significance of the signs of signs as what they mask or gloss, what they refinance, cultural studies, studies the language in and through which meanings are made in a particular culture. Cultural studies questions how such meaning reflect the power struggle within that culture studies explores how certain meanings are privileged in that culture at the cost of others.
“A cultural study is the analysis of cultures systems of meaning – production and consumption.”

Steven spielber’s movies and opera Winfred show point out, examine inter-relationship among – race, gender, popular culture, the media, and literature. The director and anchor, both of them question cultural conventions. Historical and contemporary aspects are on the oprah Winfred show, in Hollywood films. The TV Programmers in our country also presents various cultures. Gujarati, Bengali and Rajasthan TV soaps on channels are famous now a days. Such movies also run well in theatres for long time.

Elaine Showalter in her essay on feminism talks about the different cultures and contexts. She talks about American culture as well as French culture. Ronald Barlher, Claude Levi-Straurs, Jacuque Derride and Michel Foucault all had to say one or the other thing about culture in their critical essay. A culture study has connection with maxims, the new historicism, multiculturalism, postmodernism, popular culture and postcolonial studies.

Cultural Studies approaches share four goals :
(1)     Cultural Studies transcends the confiner of a particular discipline such as literacy criticism or history.
(2)     Cultural studies are politically engaged.
(3)     Cultural studies deny the separation of ‘high’ and ‘low’ are elite and popular culture.
(4)     Cultural studies analyze not only the cultural work, but also the means of production.

(1)     Cultural Studies transcends the confiner of a particular discipline such as literacy criticism or history.
                   A cultural study is practiced in such journals as critical Inquiry, Representation and boundary. Italian Opera, a Latino ‘telenovela’ the architectural styles of prisons, body piercing – and drawing conclusion about the changes in textual phenomena over time-such things are found in these kinds of newspapers cultural studies not simply or essentially about literature in the traditional sense or even about “Art”. Lawrence Grosberg, cary Nelson, and Paula. Trencher stress that the intellectual promise of cultural studies lies in its attempts to “cut across diverse social and political interests and address many of the struggles within the current scene.” Intellectual works are not limited by their “borders” as single text, historical problems or disciplines, and the critical own personal connections to what is analyzed and described. Henry Giroux and others write in their “Dalhousie Revise” manifesto that cultural studies practitioners are ‘resisting intellectuals’ who see what they do as “an emancipator project” as it erodes the traditional disciplinary divisions in most institutions of higher educational. For students, this sometimes means that a professor might make his or his own political view part of the instruction, which of course, can lead to problems. But this kind of criticism, like feminism, is an engaged rather than a detached activity.

(2)     Cultural Studies is politically engaged:
          The cultural critics see themselves as “Oppositional” not only within their own discipliner but to many of the power structures of society at large. The cultural critics question inequalities within power structures and try to find out the models for restructuring relationships among the dominant and “minority” of “Subaltern” discourses. The meaning and individual subjectivity are culturally constructed, they can thus be reconstructed. This type of idea, taken to a Philosophical extreme, demise the autonomy of the individual whether an actual person or a character in literature, a rebuttal of the traditional humanistic “Great man” or “Great Book” theory and a relocation of esthetics and culture from the ideal realsm of taste and sensibility into the arena of a whole society’s everyday life as it is constructed.


(3)     Cultural studies demise the separation of ‘high’ and ‘low’ or elite and popular culture.
                   In these days cultural critics work to transfer the term culture to include mass culture, whether popular, folk, or urban. Jean Belldrillard, Andreas Huyssen and some other critics of cultural studies argue that after World War II the distinction among high low and mass culture collapsed. They look forward on other theorists like pierre Bourdieu and Dick Hebdige on how “good taste often only reflects prevailing social, economic and political power bases.”

                   For example, the images of India that were circulated during the colonial rule of British ray by writes like Rudyard Kipling seem innocent, but reveal and entrenched imperialist argument for white superiority and worldwide domination of white superiority and world wide domination of other races, especially Asians wherever British or French or any other whoever ruled the colonist tried to show their culture superior. But race along was not the issue for the British raj: money was also another determining factor. Thus, drawing also upon the ideas of French Gistorian Michel de Certeam, cultural critics examine.
“The practice of everyday life”, studying literature as an anthropologist would, as a phenomenon of culture, including a culture’s economy. Cultural critics describe ‘what’ is produced and how various productions relate to one another. They do not determine to find out which one is the best work. Their aim is to reveal the political economic reasons ‘why’ a certain cultural product is more valued at certain times than others.
Changing of boundaries among disciplines high and low can make cultural studies just plain fun. Some of these examples are the given titles.

The birth of captain Jach Sparrow :
An Analysis
Disney’s pirates of the Caribbean: The curse o the Blach Pearl (2003)
R.L. Stevenson’s long John Silver in ‘Treasure Island’ (1881)
Keith Richard’s eye makeup.

(4)     Cultural studies analyses not only the cultural work, but also the means of production.
Marxist critics have recognized the importance of such par literary questions such as –
‘Who supports a given artist?’
‘Who publishes his or her books, and how are these books distributed’?
Who buys books?
For that matter, who is literate and who is not?
A well-known analysis of literary production is Janice Radway’s study of the America romance (novel) and its readers, “Reading the Romance: women, patriarchy and popular literature, which demonstrates the textual effects of the publishing industry’s decisions effects of the publishing industry’s decisions about books that will reduce its financial risks.”

Another contribution is the collection ‘Reading in America which is edited by Cathy N. Davidson, which includes essays on literacy and gender in colonial New England, urban magazine audiences in eighteenth – century New York  city, the impact upon reading of such technical immolation as cheaper eyeglasses, electric lights, and trains, the book – of the month club and how written and texts go through fluctuations of popularity and canonicity. Thus we can say that literature is not separate from our past, present and future.’
Cultural studies joins subjectivity means culture in relation to individual lives with ‘engagement’ a direct approach to attacking social malpractices. The practitioners of cultural studies deny ‘humanism’ or ‘the humanities’ as universal categories. The practioners strive for what they might call ‘social - reason’, which often resemble the goals and values of humanistic and democratic ideals.

Now, let us see what difference does a cultural studies approach make for the student? First of all, it is increasingly clear that by the year 2050 the United States would be what demographers call a majority minority population; by this one has to understand that the present numerical majority of ‘white’, ‘Caucasian’ and Anglo will be the minority Americans, particularly with the dramatically increasing numbers of Latina residents, mostly Mexican ameucans.

Gerald Graff and James Phelan absolve, “It is a common prediction that the culture of the next century will put a premium on people’s ability to deal productively with conflict and cultural difference, learning by controversy is sound training for citizenship in that future.”
To the enquiry “why teach the controversy?” they noted that today a student can go from one class in which the values of western culture are never questioned to the next class where western culture is portrayed as hope lessee compromised by racism, sexism and homophobia; professors can acknowledge these difference and encourage students to contract a conversation for themselves as “the most exciting part of their education.”

Above discussed are the four goals of cultural studies. Also a cultural study is divided into five parts. The first part deals with British cultural materialism where British culture and the writes and theorize are discussed. The second one in New Historicism. It discusses various historical novels with a new approach. In the discusses ‘Laputa’ is given more space and with it feminism is appropriately discussed. The third one is American multiculturalism. Here, various cultures and their works on widely discussed. American condiment has mar countries and of course they were European colonies in the past. The culture of Mexicans red Indians and ‘white’ are presented with their mode of writers. This writer write about the way they were treated in past, the way they fought for the rights and the way they live theirs life or is Asian American writers. These, writers are migrates from Asian – sub – continent. The fourth one is postmodernism and popular culture. This part wildly discuss the term postmodernism, how the writers apply this terms – ‘the fifth is postcolonial studies’.

Through the study of various one becomes a better person with his whole heart.

New Criticism,Modernism,Post Modernism


NEW CRITICISM, MODERNISM, POSTMODERNISM

Name                          :           Bhumi Vajani
                                                M.A. – English Part – I

Sem.                            :           2

Roll No.                     :           04

Paper                          :           7- Literacy Theory & Criticism

Topic                          :           New Criticism
                                                Modernism
                                                Postmodernism

Submitted to              :           Dr. Dilip  Barad
                                                Dept. of  English
                                                M.K. Bhavnagar University




New Criticism, Modernism, Postmodernism


New Criticism :
          New Criticism came by the publication of John Crowe Ranson’s ‘The Criticism’ in 1941. It came to be applied to a theory and practice that remained prominent in American Literacy Criticism up to late 1960s. This movement has the influence I.A. Richards ‘Principles of Literary Criticism’ (1924) and ‘Practical Criticism’ (1929) and from critical essay of T.S. Eliot. It apposed a prevailing interest of scholars, critics and teachers of that ear in the biographies of authors, in the social context of literature and in literacy history by insisting that the proper concern of literacy criticism is not with the external circumstances of effects or      historical position of a work, but with a detailed consideration of the work itself as an independent entity. Cleaner Brooks and Robert Prnn Warren ‘Understanding poetry’ (1938) and ‘Understanding Fiction’ (1943) did much to make the New Criticism the predominat method of teaching literature in American colleges. An influential English critic, F.R. Leavis, in turning his attention from background, sources and biography to the detailed analysis of “literacy texts themselves”, shared some of the concepts of the New criticism and their analytic focus an what he called ‘the words on the page.’

          The New criticism was extraordinarily inclination from the end of the 1930s on into the 1950. It is widely considered to have revolutionized the teaching of literature to have helped in the definition of English studies in the second half of the 20th century. New criticism may be better described as an empirical methodology that was, at its most basic and most influential a reading practice.
Although it remains true that there was no typical new critic, there are key figures whose critical approaches were closely aligned with New criticism’s development and characteristics. As well as Ransom, Richards Brooks and Warren, other important figures are Allen Tate, Kenneth Burke, R.P. Blackman, William Empson, Yvor Winters and W.K. Wimsatt.
          In  ‘Biographia Literaria’ Coleridge claimed that poetry ‘brings the whole soul of man into activity’. This phase offen cited by the New critics was an important precursor of the New critical emuphasis combination of the intellectual and the emotional.

          New Criticism has been considered a conservative practice, whose origins demonstrate the covert and sub he aestheticization of the political. It is warth remembering this, as it helps explain the extreme hostility felt toward New critism by Frank Lentricchia and Terry Eagleten. ‘International fallacy’ and the ‘affective fallacy’ are two major textual approaches associated with New Criticism.

          New Criticism sets out to illuminate the organic unity of the overall structure and verbal meaning of a text. The words ‘Tention’, ‘irony’ and ‘paradox’ occure often in New Criticism. The degree to which a work of art achieve a “reconciliation of diverge impulses” or “an equilibrium of opposed farces” is a measure of its literacy value.
When contrasted with other critical theoretical positions, New Criticism may be considered ideologically problematic, theoretically unformulated, and unsystematic. But it none the less occupies a significant place in the development of modern literacy theory and English studies. The New Criticism mounted the first serious challenge to reductionist and impressionistic opproaches to literature, and with its emphasis on rigour and objectivity, it initiated the professionalization and formalization of literary criticism as a discipline. The New Criticism valued the texture of languages and paid scrupulous alternation to the structures within that languages functioned.

v    Modernism:
Modernism is the term that should be thoroughly understood in order to understand the 20th century culture. Modernism is the name given to the movement which dominated the arts and culture of the first half of the 20th century. The movement of modernism in arts brought down much of the structure of early 20th century practice in music painting literature and architecture. Modernism (1890 – 1910) poses Vienna as centre but it spread in France, Germany, Italy and Britain too. This movement in art Cultism, Dadaism, Surrealism and Futurism. This movement is still felt today. Without understanding  modernism how can the culture be understood ? Traditional realism was rejected in favour of experimental farms of different kinds. High Modernism existed from 1910 to 1930. Some of the Modernisms are T.S. Eliot, James Joyce, Ezra Pound, Wyndham Lewis, Virginia Woolf, Wallace Stevens, Gertrude Stein, Marcel Proust, Franz Kafka. The ‘Modernism as a term is widely used to identity new and distinctive features in the subjects, forms, concepts and styles of literature and the other arts in the early decades of the twentieth century bus especially after words war I (1914-1918). The characteristics of Modernism differs from one user to another user but most of the critics agree  that Modernism includes a deliberate and radical break with some of the traditional bases not only of Western art, but of western culture in general some thinks procured Modernism. They questioned the certainties that had supported traditional moods of social organization religion and morality and also traditional ways of conceiving the human self. Thinkness such as friedrich. Nietzsech (1844-1900) Karl Marx, Freud, J.G. Graze, whose twelve – volume. ‘The Golden bough (1890-1915) stressed the correspondence between central Christian and Pagan, often barbaric maths and rituals.

Some literary figures locate Modernism revolt to 1890s but high Modernism, marked with rapidity of change, came after the first would war. After the first world, around Igzz James Joyce’s ‘Ulysses’, Eliot’s ‘The Wade Land’ and  Woolf’s ‘Jacob’s Room’ are experimented wares that came out.

A prominent feature of Modernism is the phenomenon called avant-garde (advanced gurd), that is a small, self conscious group of artists and authors who dellberately undertake in Ezra Pound’s phrase, to “make it new”.

Those writers broke all rules and regulation and peep into forbidden subject matters. They shocked the sensibilities of the conventional readers and to challenge the norms and pieties of the bourgeois culture. Peater Burger’s ‘Theory of the Anant – Grade’ (1984) is a neo – marxist analysis both of Modernism and of its distinctive cultural formation, the went garde.

Modernism was an aesthetic movement brought about by both a radical shift in consciousness and a violent transformation of social conditions in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. The change in society was abrupt and violent. The capitalists became powerful. Political and economical power went in the hands of capitalists and land owners were devoid of the power which they owed previously, religion had control over people of the society and authorities. This was displaced by enlightenment humanism. People become fully conscious and rational. The immediate effects of the industrial revolution had been a process of urbanization whereby cottage industries and rural areas were swallowed up by the new, encroaching cities and the sense of belonging to a community of sharing a common social bond, was strained as individuals were shocked into anonymity, swallowed by the masses swarming though the cities. The Modern condition is represented by the term ‘alienation’. There is a hazard of noise. It’s the age of Informative Study. The sense of purpose and continuity that had previously held was ruined and fragmented. Modernism was a an artistic attempt to capture this sense of fragmentation and alienation.

The new ‘realism’ was one of experiment and immovation, genre distinctions were collapsed and challaged as poetry started becoming prosaic, and prose become poetic. Novelists such as Virginia Woolf, James Joyce and poets like Ezra Pound and T.S. Eliot revealed that the franmentary nature of modernity is always painful.

Modernism is a literature of mourning, forever, lamenting the tragic loss of the golden age of unity and belonging. One optimist thing is that truth and beauty are still visible in the art of Modernism, but only through the shifting surfaces of the shattered fragments shored against our rain.

Modernism was the art form which captured the experience of Modernity, During the twentieth century, however, the expressive theory of authorship came under sustained attach in the Modernist insistence on the so called impersonality of the poet, Pound undaaneted, he went on to become the unofficial ringleader of literacy modernism in London in the years 1908 – 1920 and eventually achieved a huge influence over modern poetic taste.

The phase of modern literature that we call ‘Modernism’ was marked not only with radical creative experiment but also by economics tic critical declaration and proscriptions issued by poets and novelist : that Milton was a wrathless poet (Pound) that Hamlet was an incoherent play (Eliot), that Arnold Bennet was not interested in people (Woolf) and that Hawtherone and Tolstoy were leans who evaded the aimer truths of their own works (D.H. Lawrence). The initial delight of Modernism lay party in its impatient demand for critical discrimination between the culturally living and the culturally, dead and so in its determination to cast aside cautions academic literary, history in favour of rewriting ‘tradition’ on its own terms. New liking developed for fragmented forms, discontinuous narrative  and random – seeming collages of disparate material. This shift leads to produce a literature which seems dedicated to experimentation and innovation. Modernism never regained it momentum when it returned in the 1960s.

v    Postmodernism:
Postmodernism become famous since 1980s.
          J.A. Cuddon – describes postmodernism as characterized by an electric approach, parody and pastiche.’
         
          One way of establishing the distinction between modernism and postmodernism is to dissolve the sequential link between them, by retrospectively redefining certain aspects of modernism as postmodernist. This means they are not two successive stages in the history of the arts, but two apposed moods or attitudes differ.

          The tern ‘postmodernism’ is often applied to the literature and art after world war II (1939-1945). Postmodernism involves counter traditional experiments of modernism post modernism in literature and the arts has parallels with the movement known as post structuralism in linguistic and literary theory’s post structuralisms tries to  find meaningfulness.

For postmodernism, the loss of unity is not something to be mourned but something to be celebrated. It is an announcement of freedom. The tragic becomes farcical, as the search for truth has been discarded with illusions. Thus post modernism’s aesthetic is not only fraclured and fragmented, it is flat. Opposing the surface model of modernism, post modernism’s art denies the possibility of depth, post modernism art seeks to deconstruct the previously held dichotomy between art and pop culture. Post modernism thrives on surplus and promiscus excess. It has no controlling, linear narrative, no predetermined goal or point of clause (tools) and its refusal of internal structural meaning legitimate all possible and potential meanings. Post modernism is anti art, it as a direct challenge to the authority of the expert, and claims to liberate creativity from the predetermined, central discourses of society. Just as modernism was the art form which captured the expeience of modernity, so post modernism is the art form that captural epoch which reflects the triumph of capitalism. Post modernism provided the best references Dick Hebidge, Jurgen Habermas, Terry Eagle ton and Christopher Norris have rallied and railed against the turn towards post modernism. It is a positive light. For Eagleton, post modernism is  a state of post radicalism.
         
          For French intellectuals 1968 is a crucial year and it is impossible to understand the pessimism, defeatism, and quiestism inherent in post modernism without at least some understanding of this historical moment. Post modernism is in many ways, part of the harvest sown in the 1960s. The signs of betrayal and stings of disillusionment have never really headed. But it, in the eyes of Lyotard and his contemporaries, 68 revealed itself as a failure of the revolutionary aims, it was also a triumph for cultural leftism. It the big picture is unchangeable, if the centre is unassailable, then localized strategies of resistance become the only pragmatic option.
         
          Bauman asserts that the move from modernism is post modernism occurred when modernism’s doubt that the evidence is as yet incomplete, that ignorance has not yet been toppled, gave way to the second, always present, always repressed doubt that opened the way to post modernism.

          The problem with post modernism no matter how you approach it, is that both its radical potential and its structural in ability to achieve that potential are undeniable. As a philosophy, it leads to title more than a sterile skepticism. Post modernism offers space for the unlimited potentialities and marginal position to be explored. To achieve anything from the post modernism experience, however the cycle should be broken to act. Post modernism plays an importance role in building up the contradictions in the master narratives and power discourses. It offers a moment of tension a temporary, provisional and always precarious middle ground that is used to see things in a different way. In the world of instant transmission and information overload, in a world where the speed of life has been accelerated, and the attention span compressed post modernism provides a welcome brake example an opportunity to decelerate and to freeze the time to fulfill the imitative and find the critical moment.